home | contact us | subscribe | search

 


 > Why should selling be optional
Yesterday was a day of firsts for me. First time in Latin America. First time presenting via a translator (it worked effortlessly). And first time I've
 > Sales forecasts: hocus-pocus with a dollar sign!
The emergence of cargo cults on some Pacific Islands after World War II is an amusing and oft-repeated story. The relatively primitive lifestyles of these
 > The Ballistix Forum is no more. Long live SalesProcessEngineering.n
Hello there The Ballistix Forum has moved. And, in the process of moving, it has transformed itself into a Blog! Actually, it has been transformed by Brenton
 > Why you should simplify your engagement model
As many of you know, I've been splitting my time between Australia and the US for the last six months or so. I've been interested to see that, although I've
 > Updated definitions: prospect and opportunity
Hi there Here are updated definitions of those two critical words: Prospect: a prospect is an individual (or organisation) assessed to have a non-zero
 > Project Triangle
Imagine the project triangle: Features (F), Resources (R) and Schedule (S). Each side of the traiangle can make a choice as follows: Accept, Optimize, Fixed.
 > Calling South American TOC experts
If you are based in South America and you think you might be interested in a license to deliver Ballistix Sales Process Engineering projects (with
 > Major cause of low sales
If we were to classify the potential causes of low sales into three categories: 1) Market and offer mismatch (wrong market, wrong offer or both) 2) Lack of
 > Sometimes salespeople SHOULD be autonomous agents!
I guess I don't really mind that people generally regard me as being opposed to salesperson autonomy (and, of course, performance pay). Antagonism is certainly
 > Re: Reengineering the Real Estate Agency
Somewhat of a combination of what I've read on this post... 1) Pay for an independant dollar value assessment of your house. 2) Do a little research on your
 > Re: Reengineering the Real Estate Agency
If you review the article, the issue of the property not selling for a higher price and REA pushing for deal that may not be in the best interest of the
 > Re: Reengineering the Real Estate Agency
Success is often found when goals are aligned. By this I mean aligning your goals to the REA's. I think you are correct in deducing that a fast sale is of more
 > Re: Reengineering the Real Estate Agency
This is an interesting discussion at a convenient moment, as I am about to sell my house using an REA. That in itself is not very interesting and certainly not
 > Re: Reengineering the Real Estate Agency
I think that the commercialisation breakthrough would need to centre around reducing or removing the uncertainties for the vendor. This would seem to be prime
 > Re: Reengineering the Real Estate Agency
Justin From the perspective of someone who has dealt with Real Estate agents a lot, the reason we distrust them is that they are given 5-7% of the selling

 

Welcome to Ballistix!

Justin Roff-Marsh (Founder and Managing Director) Here at Ballistix, our speciality is what we call sales process engineering. We work predominantly with organisations that sell services and 'major' products.  We assist these organisations with sales process design and management, technology, and communications.

As well as information on our organisation, this site features numerous (over 30) articles from AdVerb, our popular sales process engineering newsletter.  Take a look at some of these articles and, if you like what you see, be sure to request a free subscription.

After you've done that, please explore ... and enjoy!

Request FREE report
This report explains why traditional approaches to sales improvement are fundamentally flawed. It then introduces a new approach to sales design that is producing breakthrough results.

> learn more

Download multimedia presentation
In 23 short minutes,this mulimedia presentation provides you with a sound understanding of the steps you should take to multiply the effectiveness of your sales process.

learn more

Register for manufacturer study
benchmark your sales process against those of your peers — absolutely free of charge! And, potentially, learn how to multiply sales output, with minimal increase in operating expense

> learn more

AdVerb: Articles from back-issues
 
AdVerb: Current feature article
 
Is your salesperson really selling?

How to maximise the effectiveness of your salespeople. [more]

[top] [subscribe]

 
The nine most terrible words any marketing manager can possibly utter

The ad doesn't produce sales '... but at least we're getting our name out there!' [more]

[top] [subscribe]

 
How to turn customers into clients – and clients into advocates for your business

tips on building relationships – introducing marketers' 'Ladder of Loyalty' [more]

[top] [subscribe]

 
How to build an objective management structure for your sales process

While the idea that the goal of a commercial organisation is to make money may initially cause managers some discomfort (believe me, it does), it also provides the clarity we need to start to piece together an objective management structure. [more]

[top] [subscribe]

 
Why there’s a silent ‘$’ in ‘Relationship’: and why the integrity of your sales process depends upon it!

Among our loyal flock of AdVerb subscribers there are those who profess to embrace our principles but who flout at least one of them conspicuously! [more]

[top] [subscribe]

 

Performance pay: the case against

Few suggestions inflame passions faster than the suggestion that performance pay be abolished.

It’s our contention, nonetheless, that, in an ideal environment, commissions and bonuses are likely to be in conflict with the goal of the organisation.

Of course, traditional sales processes are not ’ideal environments’ and, as such, the traditional sales process serves as an illustration of the conditions under which performance pay is, in fact, appropriate!

Let’s begin, accordingly, with the case forperformance pay.

The case for performance pay

Let’s envisage a situation where performance pay definitely makes sense.

The situation that springsto mind immediately is outsourcing — or more generally — the use of contractors.

If you have outsourced a task to a contractor, it makes sense to compensate that contractor on a per-piece (or results) basis.

Because you are outsourcing, you have no control over the contractor’s production process (you can consider only inputsand outputs) and, as a consequence, it doesn’t make sense for you to gamble on something over which you have no control.

Most organisations understand this explicitly.  This is why most contractors (including service providers) are under pressure to quote on a fixed-price — rather than a time-and-materials — basis.

Now, if you consider the structure of a typical sales process (as discussed in the preceding article), you’ll realise that the relationship between the salesperson and the organisation is more similar to a contractor-clientthan it is to an employer-employee relationship:

1.

Salespeople are responsible for the end-to-end sales process.

2.

Management has limited (if any) access to objective process data.

3.

Salespeople perceive that they own customer relationships (and in many cases they do!)

In this environment, it certainly does make sense to pay salespeople as you would a contractor.

But, as you well know, we maintain that this isnot an ideal environment.

What we now have to consider is how the radically different environment we advocate impacts on the case for performance pay.

The ideal environment

In summary, the essential differences between a typical ... [ more ]

[ top ] [ subscribe ]